Saturday, July 23, 2005

GOP, globalists are killing our economy

Molly Ivins - July 23, 2005 - 7:00PM

If you had done a poll in November 2000, or in November 2004, I don’t think you would have gotten out of single digits with this proposition: “George W. Bush wants to radically revise American law, including complete repeal of the New Deal, and take us back to the economic legal system that prevailed at the turn of the 19th century — Robber Barons Redux.”

During the past five years, both media and political circles have devoted an enormous amount of attention to social issues and culture wars — rise of the Christian Right, anti-abortion groups, our debates over moral decline and moral relativism, prayer in the schools, school vouchers, displaying the Ten Commandments, sex and violence in entertainment, bias in the news media, gay marriage and all the rest of it.

I sometimes think all of it amounts to a bunch of people saying, “The world would be a much better place if everybody else thought exactly the same way I do.” Reminds me of Dr. Henry Higgins in his famous philosophical disquisition, “Why Can’t A Woman Be More Like A Man?” Higgins finally discovers the ultimate problem:
“Why can’t a woman be more like ME?”

Then, of necessity, we have spent huge amounts of time on Sept. 11, terrorism, Iraq, and related and ancillary problems. It is not necessary to review the bidding here, but Iraq is becoming as divisive and unpopular as the Vietnam War. While we have been absorbed in the silly circus of cultural issues and the riveting questions of the war, we’ve also been getting our pockets picked. Big time.

The U.S. is over $7 trillion in debt (no problem);
China buys $1 billion worth of U.S. treasury bills a day (thanks for floating us);
Americans love the prices at Wal-Mart (made in China, cute!);
the Chinese save 50 percent of their domestic product;
the average American has $9,000 on his credit cards;
our economy is fueled by a fragile housing bubble;
the minimum wage is $5.15 per hour;
taxpayers who earn over $1 million saved $30K under Bush tax cuts;
the war in Iraq costs $9 billion a month;
by 2040, our kids will be unable to do more than pay the interest on the national debt; bankruptcy reform makes it impossible to escape your debts;
in Darfur Sudan, people earn $1.25 a day.

For economic news, I recommend Bill Greider’s op-ed article in the July 18 New York Times, “America’s Truth Deficit.” He begins with the startling thesis that we face structural economic problems as serious as those that destroyed the late Soviet Union and that, as in the USSR before its breakup, our leaders cannot talk about these problems honestly. “Our weakening position in the global trading system is obvious and ominous, yet leaders in politics, business, finance and the news media are not willing to discuss candidly what is happening and why. Instead they recycle the usual bromides about the benefits of free trade and assurances that everything will work out for the best.”

It is a curious thing that as the disadvantages and, indeed, perils of globalization become clearer and the subject of ever more worried books by respected economists, the mainstream media keep treating the whole problem as though it were about a bunch of protesters in turtle costumes at the G8 summit. If it were not for Lou Dobbs on CNN, one would never even hear it mentioned on television.

Forget what the Supreme Court thinks about teaching creationism in the schools: Think about what it will contribute to the spiraling disasters of globalization by dismantling the entire economic regulatory system built up over the past 100 years. As Greider notes, “Washington defines ‘national interest’ primarily in terms of advancing the global reach of our multinational enterprises.”

Problem is, our multinational corporations increasingly work against the interests of Americans themselves. In addition to outsourcing jobs, the companies locate sham headquarters in offshore tax havens to avoid paying taxes. The only restraints we have ever had on multinational corporations are government regulation and the right to sue the bastards for the various kinds of harm they cause. It is precisely those two forms of control that are being not just undermined but tossed out entirely by an increasingly activist right-wing judiciary.

Recommended reading: Greider’s “One World, Ready Or Not”;
David Korten’s “When Corporations Rule the World”;
and Paul Krugman’s “The Great Unraveling.”
Ivins is a syndicated columnist.

Talk Back: [write to the editor] [discuss in the forum]
http://www.wvgazette.com/webtools/print/Columns/2005072210

With Bush's help, GE courts Indian PM, nuke sector

Bush's announcement on nuclear trade with India - By Adam Entous Saturday July 23 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Just over an hour after the White House's surprise pledge to help India develop its civilian nuclear power sector, the head of General Electric, the American company that could benefit most from the policy change, sat down for a celebratory dinner.

The host was President Bush; a few feet away was India's prime minister, Manmohan Singh, and his top aides. GE Chief Executive Jeff Immelt, a contributor to Bush's presidential campaigns, had a coveted seat at the president's table.

Bush's announcement on nuclear trade with India -- followed by a formal dinner in the State dining room -- was not just a victory for Singh. For GE, the only U.S.-owned company still in the nuclear business, it marked a possible turning point in a years-long push to re-enter the Indian nuclear power market, which it was forced to leave in 1974 when India conducted its first nuclear test.

"In the short term, it's really business as usual. ... But if things unfold the way it looks they may, then clearly it is a significant opportunity for us," said Peter Wells, general manager of marketing for GE Energy's nuclear business.
While the policy change may benefit GE and other companies in the long term, critics contend Bush's move closer to accepting the world's largest democracy as a nuclear weapons state could weaken decades-old prohibitions against atomic arms.

"This administration's rogue, shoot-from-the-hip move to launch nuclear cooperation with India puts the interests of industry ahead of our national security," said Democratic Rep. Edward Markey of Massachusetts, an arms control advocate.
GE was not mentioned in the joint statement issued by Bush and Singh, but Bush specifically pledged "expeditious consideration of fuel supplies for safeguarded nuclear reactors at Tarapur."

GE built Tarapur and one of its immediate goals in India would be resuming fuel sales to the reactors, Wells said.
Immelt -- who said in May that "all conditions are right to invest in India" and predicted that GE revenues from there could jump to $5 billion by 2010 -- was not the only American executive at Monday's dinner with a reason to court Singh.

Bush also invited Lockheed Martin Corp. chief Bob Stevens and Boeing Co.'s new chief executive, James McNerney. Bush cleared the way in March for the two defense contractors to compete for a potential $9 billion market selling combat planes to India. GE makes jet engines for Lockheed and Boeing.

GE spokesman Peter O'Toole said "tying GE's attending a State Dinner to a political contribution is misleading. We support officials in both parties and have done so for years."
"Jeff (Immelt) wants GE products picked to help solve India's challenges; who better to make the case with than the prime minister?" O'Toole added.

BUSH'S NOD TO GENERAL ELECTRIC
Washington actively promoted nuclear energy cooperation with India from the mid-1950s until the nuclear test in 1974. U.S. nuclear cooperation and exports were later halted, freezing out GE, which built the Tarapur reactor in 1963 and supplied it with low-enriched uranium as fuel.
India has since become the second-largest growth market behind China. In a sign of its growing importance to Washington, Bush on Monday promised India full cooperation in developing its civilian nuclear power program in exchange for New Delhi's commitment to adhere to international regimes aimed at curbing arms proliferation.

Provided the Indians move quickly to fulfill their obligations, congressional sources said, it was Bush's intention to seek congressional approval to implement the agreement on civil nuclear cooperation this year.

"It's the jewel in the crown," GlobalSecurity.org's John Pike said of the Indian market. "We're the world's two largest English-speaking countries. We're the two largest democracies and we're joined at the hip economically."

Henry Sokolski of the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center said Bush's decision was unlikely to benefit GE any time soon. "This may be cream but it's certainly not gravy train, certainly not for a while." Sokolski said, adding that GE will face stiff competition from non-U.S. suppliers.

GE'S ROLE
In the runup to Singh's visit, GE held a series of meetings at the departments of State, Commerce and Energy, but Wells said the company did not explicitly lobby the White House to change longstanding policy.
"It maybe sounds a little subtle, but we try not to tell the U.S. government what we think their foreign policy should be," Wells said.

At a recent State Department meeting, Wells said, "We wanted to better understand what the U.S. government's view was of the situation and also to put an offer out there to them that was to say, 'We understand you've got a lot of considerations to go through here when you make a policy decision, and if there's anything we can do to help, then let us know."'
In addition to resuming fuel sales to Tarapur, Wells said GE could move quickly to offer technical and maintenance services for Indian nuclear plants, and eventually bid to build new reactors. If Bush succeeds in pushing through the policy changes, "clearly we would look for U.S. government support to advocate on behalf of GE," Wells said.

That support could take the form of government-to-government lobbying or Export-Import Bank loans for future GE projects in India, experts said.
Earlier this year, the Export-Import Bank gave preliminary approval for $5 billion in loans to help British-owned Westinghouse Electric Co. and other U.S. suppliers win contracts to build four nuclear power plants in China.

George W Bush: Willing SLAVE for a willing SLAVE owner

A Message from President Bush:
"America is not a fortress; no, we never want to be a fortress. We're a free country; we're an open society. And we must always protect the rights of our law -- of law-abiding citizens from around the world who come here to conduct business or to study or to spend time with their family."-- 14 May 2002, President Bush Signs Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act
Welcome to the Visa section of travel.state.gov, an official source of information about United States ( U.S. ) visa policy and procedures. We hope you’ll use this site to learn about different types of U.S. visas, the application process, and to better understand the requirements you need to meet in order to receive your visa.
Millions of foreign visitors travel to the U.S. each year. Others come to live here permanently. International visitors and immigrants add greatly to our nation's cultural, education and economic life. We welcome them. At the same time, we need to do everything we can to keep everyone here, safe. We believe in secure borders and open doors.
A citizen of a foreign country, wishing to enter the U.S., generally must first obtain a visa, either a nonimmigrant visa for temporary stay, or an immigrant visa for permanent residence. The type of visa you must have is defined by immigration law, and relates to the purpose of your travel. If your destination is the U.S., please watch this brief video , which explains new visa policies and procedures for visitors to the United States -- a nation with secure borders and open doors.

Tips for U.S. Visas: Temporary Workers
CLASSIFICATIONS
The Immigration and Nationality Act provides several categories of nonimmigrant visas for a person who wishes to work temporarily in the United States. There are annual numerical limits on some classifications which are shown in parentheses.
H-1B classification applies to persons in a specialty occupation which requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge requiring completion of a specific course of higher education. This classification requires a labor attestation issued by the Secretary of Labor (65,000). This classification also applies to Government-to-Government research and development, or coproduction projects administered by the Department of Defense (100);
H-2A classification applies to temporary or seasonal agricultural workers;
H-2B classification applies to temporary or seasonal nonagricultural workers. This classification requires a temporary labor certification issued by the Secretary of Labor (66,000);
H-3 classification applies to trainees other than medical or academic. This classification also applies to practical training in the education of handicapped children (50);
L classification applies to intracompany transferees who, within the three preceding years, have been employed abroad continuously for one year, and who will be employed by a branch, parent, affiliate, or subsidiary of that same employer in the U.S. in a managerial, executive, or specialized knowledge capacity;
O-1 classification applies to persons who have extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics, or extraordinary achievements in the motion picture and television field;
O-2 classification applies to persons accompanying an O-1 alien to assist in an artistic or athletic performance for a specific event or performance;
P-1 classification applies to individual or team athletes, or members of an entertainment group that are internationally recognized (25,000);
P-2 classification applies to artists or entertainers who will perform under a reciprocal exchange program;
P-3 classification applies to artists or entertainers who perform under a program that is culturally unique (same as P-1); and
Q-1 classification applies to participants in an international cultural exchange program for the purpose of providing practical training, employment, and the sharing of the history, culture, and traditions of the alien's home country.
PETITIONS
In order to be considered as a nonimmigrant under the above classifications the applicant's prospective employer or agent must file Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker, with the United States Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security (BCIS). Once approved, the employer or agent is sent a notice of approval, Form I-797. It should be noted that the approval of a petition shall not guarantee visa issuance to an applicant found to be ineligible under provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
VISA INELIGIBILITY/WAIVER
The nonimmigrant visa application Form DS-156 list classes of persons who are ineligible under U.S. law to receive visas. In some instances an applicant who is ineligible, but who is otherwise properly classifiable as a temporary worker, may apply for a waiver of ineligibility and be issued a visa if the waiver is approved.
APPLYING FOR THE VISA
Applicants for temporary work visas should generally apply at the American Embassy or Consulate with jurisdiction over their place of permanent residence. Although visa applicants may apply at any U.S. consular office abroad, it may be more difficult to qualify for the visa outside the country of permanent residence.
Required Documentation
Each applicant for a temporary worker visa must pay a nonrefundable US$100 application fee and submit:
1) An application Form DS-156, completed and signed. The DS-156 must be the February 2003 date, either the electronic "e-form application" or the non-electronic version. Select Nonimmigrant Visa Application Form DS-156 to access both versions of the DS-156. You may also check with the Embassy Consular Section where you will apply to determine if the hard-copy blank DS-156 form is available, should you need it.
2) A Supplemental Nonimmigrant Visa Application, Form DS-157 provides additional information about your travel plans. Submission of this completed form is required for all male applicants between 16-45 years of age. It is also required for all applicants from state sponsors of terrorism age 16 and over, irrespective of gender, without exception. Seven countries are now designated as state sponsors of terrorism, including North Korea, Cuba, Syria, Sudan, Iran, Iraq, and Libya. Select Special Processing Procedures to learn more. You should know that a consular officer may require any nonimmigrant visa applicant to complete this form. Here is Form DS-157 .
3) A passport valid for travel to the United States and with a validity date at least six months beyond the applicant's intended period of stay in the United States. If more than one person is included in the passport, each person desiring a visa must make an application;
4) One (1) 2x2 photograph. See the required photo format explained in nonimmigrant photograph requirements .
5) A notice of approval, Form I-797.
Other Documentation
With the exception of the H-1 and L-1, applicants may also need to show proof of binding ties to a residence outside the United States which they have no intention of abandoning. It is impossible to specify the exact form the evidence should take since applicants' circumstances vary greatly.
U.S. PORT OF ENTRY
Applicants should be aware that a visa does not guarantee entry into the United States. The Directorate of Border and Transportation Security in the Department of Homeland Security has authority to deny admission. Also, the period for which the bearer of a temporary work visa is authorized to remain in the United States is determined by the Directorate of Border and Transportation Security, not the consular officer. At the port of entry, a Directorate of Border and Transportation Security official validates Form I-94, Record of Arrival-Departure, which notes the length of stay permitted. Those temporary workers who wish to stay beyond the time indicated on their Form I-94 must contact the Directorate of Border and Transportation Security to request Form I-539, Application to Extend Status. The decision to grant or deny a request for extension of stay is made solely by the Directorate of Border and Transportation Security.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Family Members
With the exception of "Q-1 Cultural Exchange Visitors," the spouse and unmarried, minor children of an applicant under any of the above classifications may also be classified as nonimmigrants in order to accompany or join the principal applicant. A person who has received a visa as the spouse or child of a temporary worker may not accept employment in the United States. The principal applicant must be able to show that he or she will be able to support his or her family in the United States.
Time Limits
All of the above classifications have fixed time limits in which the alien may perform services in the United States. In some cases those time limits may be extended by the BCIS in order to permit the completion of the services. Thereafter, the alien must remain abroad for a fixed period of time before being readmitted as a temporary worker under any classification. The BCIS will notify the petitioner on Form I-797 whenever a visa petition, an extension of a visa petition, or an extension of stay is approved under any of the above classifications. The beneficiary may use a copy of Form I-797 to apply for a new or revalidated visa during the validity period of the petition. The approval of a permanent labor certification or the filing of a preference petition for an alien under the H-1 or L classifications shall not be a basis for denying a visa.
FURTHER INQUIRIES
Questions about petitioning procedures, qualifications for various classifications, and conditions and limitations on employment should be made by the prospective employer or agent in the United States to the nearest BCIS office. Questions on the visa application to the American consular official should be addressed to the appropriate consular office abroad by the applicant.http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/types/types_1271.html

Friday, July 22, 2005

Corporate Icons Lead Bad U.S. Labor Week

Led by Kodak and Hewlett-Packard, Corporate Icons Make It a Bad Week for American Labor - Friday July 22, 2:18 pm ET By Ben Dobbin, AP Business Writer

ROCHESTER, N.Y. (AP) -- In a week where Alan Greenspan said he expected the U.S. economy to keep growing and Wall Street seemed generally pleased with corporate performance, workers at Eastman Kodak Co., Hewlett-Packard Co. and Kimberly-Clark Corp., among others, were warned about thousands of new layoffs.
"You get immune to it after a while," longtime Kodak technician John Hladis said with barely a shrug when the scythe fell once more at the Rochester-based photography company, slicing away another 10,000 employees.
But some economy watchers are suddenly concerned that this latest flurry of job cuts -- a byproduct of various trends such as outsourcing, mergers, automation, changing technology and consumer demands -- may foreshadow some trouble ahead.
"We won't know till afterwards, but I do think we may be seeing a tipping point in the economic cycle that these big layoffs are flagging," said John A. Carpenter, chief executive of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a Chicago-based employment research firm. "I think it's a sign that leaks are breaking out."
One thing is for certain: It was not a good week for American labor. In fact, it's been an unusually torrid summer in terms of trimming payrolls.
U.S. corporations announced plans in June to cut 110,996 jobs -- the highest monthly total in 17 months -- and July's toll could turn out to be steeper. Overall job cuts are on the rise in 2005, reaching 538,274 through June, according to Challenger's monthly job-cut analysis.
Suffering its third straight quarterly loss, Kodak upped its job-slashing target by 10,000 on Wednesday from an earlier range of 12,000 to 15,000. By mid-2007, its worldwide payroll should level out below 50,000, one-third what it was in 1988.
Even as the picture-taking pioneer enjoys rapid gains in digital photography, it is struggling to cope with plummeting demand for conventional silver-halide film, its cash cow for the last century.
"We cannot keep bleeding year after year," Kodak's new chief executive, Antonio Perez, told analysts. "We need to establish an end point to this transformation, and we need to get there soon." (STOP the bleeding, FIRE Kodak cheif Antonio Parez)
The same applies at Hewlett-Packard. The Palo Alto, Calif., computer and printer maker moved Tuesday to modify its pension benefits and eliminate 14,500 jobs, or nearly 10 percent of its work force, in a scramble to rein in bloated costs and combat efficient rivals.
Kimberly-Clark joined the job terminators Friday: The maker of Kleenex tissues and Huggies diapers plans to let 6,000 people go and sell or close as many as 20 plants. And Ford Motor Corp., which is already cutting 2,700 salaried workers this year, is mulling more aggressive measures.
In contrast, International Business Machines Corp.'s second-quarter earnings beat Wall Street's expectations, suggesting a rebound from its difficulties this spring when it targeted 14,500 job cuts, primarily in Europe.
Indeed, the economic picture displayed plenty of positives this past week.
The Labor Department said the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits plunged 34,000 to 303,000 -- the largest one-week improvement since December 2002. And while Greenspan cautioned that a big run-up in already high energy prices could throw a wrench into his forecast, the Federal Reserve Board chairman reiterated his bullish economic outlook.
"The economy," Challenger acknowledged, "has been very strong for the last year. We've seen over 2 million jobs created, we've seen unemployment drop to 5.0 percent, but I feel like we've probably hit the high water mark.
"We are beginning to see some of these icon companies topple a bit. It's not visible too much yet, but these are signs and suggest the next six months to a year are going to be tougher times for the economy."
The huge overhauls at General Motors Corp., Kodak and other bellwether companies are hardly surprising considering the heightened pressures of global competition, countered Pete Sperling, professor of finance at Yeshiva University's Sy Syms School of Business in New York. The U.S. economy has become more dominated by service industries, he said.
"It's something that's basically long overdue," Sperling said, referring to the transformations under way at many legacy manufacturers. "I would almost argue that if these businesses don't get it done now, we'll be in bigger trouble down the road. It's adapt or just go by the wayside.
"One of the most difficult things," Sperling added, "is you need a senior management that knows how to function in this kind of environment -- and that's very difficult to find. At Kodak, it sounds as if at least they're moving in the right direction."
Kodak is hoping film will continue to bring enough cash as it steadies on its new bearing. But less than seven weeks after taking the helm, CEO Perez is already reaching for the ax.
Hladis, 55, who joined Kodak in 1975, has survived a seemingly endless string of company cutbacks over the last quarter-century and is glad to be working in a research unit focused on "mostly digital stuff." But Stan Beloch, 52, a machine operator, worries his 15-year career has fallen in front of the firing line.
"They tell us nobody is going to lose their jobs, they can send us to other areas of the company," he said gloomily. "But there's not a whole lot of other areas you can go to."
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050722/economy_job_losses.html?.v=4&printer=1

Wednesday, July 20, 2005

Race to the Bottom: Kodak and HP plans to cut around 25,000 jobs each

Kodak Shedding Up to 10,000 More Jobs
By BEN DOBBIN, AP Business Writer - Wednasday July 20, 2005
Eastman Kodak Co. said Wednesday it is cutting as many as 10,000 more jobs as the company that turned picture-taking into a hobby for the masses navigates a tough transition from film to digital photography.
The lightning transition to a world without film is forcing an extreme makeover at the world's biggest maker of the product and coincided with the disclosure of a second-quarter loss. Shares of the company stock dipped more than 6 percent.
On top of 12,000 to 15,000 layoffs targeted 18 months ago, Kodak is reducing its payroll by almost a quarter from where it stood in 2004, when a string of recent acquisitions is taken into account.
Kodak missed Wall Street forecasts by a wide margin, largely because of a steeper-than-expected slide in film sales — even in emerging markets such as China. It lost $146 million, or 51 cents a share, in the April-June quarter, compared to a profit of $136 million, or 46 cents, a year ago.
Revenue grew 6 percent to $3.69 billion from $3.46 billion in last year's second quarter.
Excluding restructuring and research charges, plus $19 million in asset impairments from an investment in China's Lucky Film Co., Kodak posted earnings from continuing operations of 53 cents a share. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial had forecast earnings of 80 cents a share.
"I don't need to change our overall strategy — the further we get into this, the better the strategy looks," Kodak's new chief executive, Antonio Perez, said during a conference call with analysts. "But I need to dramatically accelerate some of the steps needed to get there.
"Sales of our consumer traditional products are declining faster than expected," he said. "Although we have been moving rapidly to get our costs down ... we are picking up the pace dramatically. This is what the company needs to succeed as a digital company."
To fortify its swelling digital businesses, Kodak is slashing deeper than it set out to do in January 2004.
The new cuts will include 7,000 manufacturing jobs, many in Kodak's hometown.
"It's a company now oriented toward having others make everything else for them, and concentrating on research and marketing," said Ulysses Yannas, a broker for Buckman, Buckman & Reid.
Kodak plans to make as many 25,000 job cuts by the middle of 2007 and trim its traditional manufacturing assets to about $1 billion, down from $2.9 billion in January 2004. The company will also add about 8,000 employees, however, bringing its work force to under 50,000 people.
Kodak wrapped up an almost $3 billion shopping spree in January to expand its reach as a digital heavyweight in photography, medical imaging and commercial printing.
With the era of soaring sales and fat profits from chemical-based businesses now departed, Kodak expects digital technology to become its biggest source of revenue this year for the first time.
In the second quarter, sales of digital products and services in all its businesses rose 43 percent to $1.843 billion, helped by a sharp rise in sales of cameras, kiosks and thermal printers. In contrast, revenue on the analog side dropped 15 percent to $1.843 billion — exactly in line with digital sales.
Kodak said its digital sales in June exceeded traditional revenues for the first time ever. Hurt by falling traditional sales, even in China's more affluent, coastal regions, Kodak now expects its traditional sales to plunge from 23 percent to 27 percent in 2005, compared with a 20 percent drop forecast in April.
Health imaging sales rose 3 percent to $694 million, reflecting better-than-expected traditional sales. Graphic communications sales soared 144 percent to $794 million, largely because of Kodak's buyout this year of Sun Chemical Corp.'s 50 percent stake in a jointly owned commercial graphic-arts business.
Digital accounted for around $5.5 billion of sales in 2004, but could vault as high as $8 billion this year. Chemical-based businesses will account for around $6.6 billion, down from $8 billion in 2004.
Founded in 1881 by George Eastman, Kodak turned point-and-shoot photography into an overnight craze when it came out with a $1 Brownie camera in 1900. A century later, the swift shift to digital looked to have caught it off-guard. Kodak insists it was waiting for a mass market to clearly develop, and it has since captured the top spot in the U.S. point-and-shoot digital camera market.
"They're No. 1 in just about everything they compete in except for commercial digital printing," Yannas said. "They're No. 1 in health care, in cameras, in home printers.
Hewlett-Packard, IBM's been doing the same thing. It's a question of adjusting their model for the digital world."
Kodak stock fell $1.85, or 6.4 percent, to close at $26.89 in trading Wednesday on the New York Stock Exchange. On the Net: http://www.kodak.com
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050720/ap_on_bi_ge/earns_eastman_kodak
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Huge HP layoff expected any day - Posted on Fri, Jul. 15, 2005
By Therese PolettiKNIGHT RIDDER
Hewlett-Packard could announce the layoff of as many as 10,000 to 25,000 employees next week as part of a plan to restructure the Palo Alto technology giant, according to Wall Street analysts.
Such a shake-up has been anticipated since HP Chief Executive Mark Hurd replaced ousted CEO Carly Fiorina in April. Some HP workers have taken to calling the expected reorganization ``the Big One.''
HP spokeswoman Alexa Hanes declined to comment on a growing number of reports on Wall Street that Hurd's unveiling of his strategy for HP is imminent. Hurd has said HP needs to cut costs and improve performance to compete against rivals like Dell.
On Thursday, Cindy Shaw, an analyst at Moors & Cabot, issued a report citing a Silicon Valley insider who said HP may announce a management reorganization as early as Monday that could include widely expected layoffs. Shaw's report was the first to predict job cuts could be as high as 25,000. HP employs 9,000 people in the Bay Area and 150,000 people worldwide.
She said a management reorganization could include the long-expected retirement of Chief Financial Officer Bob Wayman, if Hurd has found a replacement for him. Vyomesh Joshi, who heads HP's highly profitable printing business, will remain in his job.
Hurd, the former chief executive of NCR, already has brought in two outside executives to bolster his management team. He hired Dell's chief information officer, Randy Mott, clearly signaling his intent to replicate Dell's ability to hold down costs. Last month, Hurd separated the printer business from the personal computer business, undoing one of Fiorina's last moves as CEO. Hurd hired Todd Bradley, previously the CEO of handheld computer maker palmOne, to head up HP's PC business.
Toni Sacconaghi, a Sanford Bernstein analyst, recently issued a report predicting Hurd may also cut HP's research and development budget. That could endanger some of the company's loftier, futuristic research as well as what HP executives have long cited as a competitive advantage over Dell, which spends far less on R&D. Sacconaghi estimated Hurd could cut HP's $3.5 billion R&D budget by $250 million to $500 million. Sacconaghi estimated, though, that HP's research and development spending is nearly $1 billion more than the sum of its relevant competitors.
Earlier this week, HP introduced improvements in its printing technology that will help it save future manufacturing costs.
Some HP employees who have met with Hurd when he visited their divisions said the no-nonsense CEO talked about which HP operations were ``off benchmark,'' meaning their profits were weaker than competitors or their costs were higher.
``He said, this is where everybody else is, there is where we are at,'' said one HP employee who asked not to be named for fear of retribution for speaking to the media.
Wall Street analysts have been predicting for the past few weeks that Hurd would cut anywhere between 10,000 to 15,000 jobs, across a wide range of HP businesses.
Since November, HP has cut 3,000 jobs.
But analysts believe Hurd needs to cut more for the company to be competitive.
HP sells both low-profit-margin products such as personal computers, as well as high-profit corporate servers. Most PC makers, such as Dell, do not spend much on R&D, and instead let Intel and Microsoft do most of the innovating on chips and software. When it comes to big network computer servers, however, companies like HP, IBM and Sun Microsystems spend tens of millions on research to develop their own designs of faster performing systems to differentiate themselves.
``HP's challenge . . . is to apply one model to both competitive fronts, which are very, very different,'' said Shaw of Moors & Cabot.
HP is expected to announce its fiscal third quarter earnings Aug. 16. Some analysts have predicted Hurd would wait until earnings to unveil a big restructuring plan, but that seems increasingly unlikely.

Contact Therese Poletti at tpoletti@mercurynews.com or at (415) 477-2510.
http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/12141057.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

Tuesday, July 19, 2005

Economic Treason in the USA, Particularly for High-tech & Manufacturing Jobs

What Kind of Country Destroys the Job Market for Its Own Citizens? CounterPunch.org Paul Craig Roberts: Economic Treason: Mike Corbeil, lundi, 18/07/2005 - 04:08

A question some people might have after reading the above article could be, say, "But how can individual Canadian citizens and residents help out Americans in this kind of (treachorous) context?", and the answer is very simple, albeit not easy for many or all to accept, for many people are self-centered, selfish, greedy, .... "The how" is, by not seeking jobs in the US that require work visas issued by governments; leaving that Canadians should not seek jobs in the US on either TN or H-1B visas, for example.

And, yes, or at least it used to be true, Canadians can also apply for H-1B instead of TN; it's just that they're usually required to go the TN route, and I believe it's most likely because (if the rule hasn't changed over the past several years anyway) TN visas are valid for only one year at a time, needing to be renewed yearly, while H-1B visas (again, if the rule hasn't changed ...) are valid for three years at a time, provide cheaper "bargains", and Canadians, citizens anyway, have access to the TN visas.

And if reality has not changed ..., then around half of all H-1B visas go to people of India; people, who certainly are no worse, certainly not in human terms, but who nevertheless are not only much less expensive than US citizens, but also much less, initially anyway, than Canadians, and not as much but nevertheless considerably less expensive than Mexicans.

Remember the news about how NAFTA led to jobs being shipped to Mexico from both Canada and the US, long known news, already, and then how, much more recently and due to globalisation, globalising imperialism and fascism, those jobs were then relocated from Mexico to India?/! It's important reality to carefully remember and pay attention to.Canadians need to cease seeking jobs in the US for which US citizens are being treasonously refused.

That applies to both citizen and non-citizen, resident Canadians, for the latter can't get jobs in the US on TN status, I believe to recall anyway, but certainly can on H-1B. Canadians not yet working in the US should refrain from applying, let alone getting to the point that rejecting actual job offers in the US can be in question. And Canadians already there on either of these visas should seek to exit and to return home as soon as possible; so that US citizens and residents can have a better chance of finding work; for Canadians to cease supporting those treasonous US citizens and residents who refuse to employ other US citizens and residents.

Mike CorbeilCantons de Hatley, QcP.S. It is very healthy to remember, and very carefully: Do for others that which you would want to be done for yourselves; and do not unto others that which you would not want done unto yourselves; Jesus of Nazareth and Confucious. Holistically, those are synonymous principles, but "appearances can be, often are, deceiving"; and based on all that is known of Jesus, it is thus arguably certain that He meant the principle in its full(est) sense. (It's just that I don't know anything about the actual life of Confucious, not having yet taken time to learn about it, and thus cannot say if he would have meant the principle he stated in its complete, holistically whole sense.)

If Canadians can come to sound, healthy understanding and acceptance of those two principles, then it should help in terms of not seeking jobs, capitalistic opportunities in the US, or anywhere for that matter; where the citizens of the country in question are being treasonously treated. Sometimes we need a little extra inspiration, and the above two principles are not an unhealthy commencement; the combined whole of them being very healthy.To be complicit with treason, well, the example from Jeanne d'Arc's, aka Joan of Arc, story provides a couple of examples.

It's about war, opposing imperialistic invasion, conquest and domination, which is very fitting for current world events, but also with respect to what's been happening for American workers; "tangentially" speaking. For that, people can simply go to TheFreeDictionary.com and search on "Joan of Arc". (Francophones wanting to read the text in French can go to the same page, scroll to the bottom and choose a link on Jeanne d'Arc from there.)

Check for the encyclopedia links near the top of the intial page, especially if it's only the dictionary entry on her story; the other pages having many links, including to French texts.Unfortunately, we're, today, seeing old history repeating itself; again, and again, .... "It's always, 'the same old story', over and over again."Many people who say to have good intentions are actually lying and know that they are; while many others who ignorantly cause harm only haven't a clue what real critical thinking means, or .... In the following article by Robert Fisk, a Lebanese friend of his and who has real real-world experience expresses his wonder, about whether we people in the West really live on planet earth, or not; and I venture to guess that likely most, i.e., Westerners, do not, but instead in stupid "disneyland" or "hollywood" nonsense; people caught up with nonsensical sensationalism rather than being focused on real reality.http://www.cmaq.net/fr/node.php?id=21706

Economic Treason
What Kind of Country Destroys the Job Market for Its Own Citizens?
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
The June payroll jobs report did not receive much attention due to the July 4 holiday, but the depressing 21st century job performance of the US economy continues unabated.
o Only 144,000 private sector jobs were created, each one of which was in domestic services.
o 56,000 jobs were created in professional and business services, about half of which are in administrative and waste services.
o 38,000 jobs were created in education and health services, almost all of which are in health care and social assistance.
o 19,000 jobs were created in leisure and hospitality, almost all of which are waitresses and bartenders.
o Membership associations and organizations created 10,000 jobs and repair and maintenance created 4,000 jobs.
o Financial activities created 16,000 jobs.
This most certainly is not the labor market profile of a first world country, much less a superpower.
Where are the jobs for this year's crop of engineering and science graduates?
US manufacturing lost another 24,000 jobs in June.
A country that doesn't manufacture doesn't need many engineers. And the few engineering jobs available go to foreigners.
Readers have sent me employment listings from US software development firms. The listings are discriminatory against American citizens. One ad from a company in New Jersey that is a developer for many companies, including Oracle, specifies that the applicant must have a TN visa.
A TN or Trade Nafta visa is what is given to Mexicans and Canadians, who are willing to work in the US at below prevailing wages.
Another ad from a software consulting company based in Omaha, Nebraska, specifies it wants software engineers who are H-1B transferees. What this means is that the firm is advertising for foreigners already in the US who have H-1B work visas.
The reason the US firms specify that they have employment opportunities only for foreigners who hold work visas is because the foreigners will work for less than the prevailing US salary.
Gentle reader, when you read allegations that there is a shortage of engineers in America, necessitating the importation of foreigners to do the work, you are reading a bald faced lie. If there were a shortage of American engineers, employers would not word their job listings to read that no American need apply and that they are offering jobs only to foreigners holding work visas.
What kind of country gives preference to foreigners over its own engineering graduates?
What kind of country destroys the job market for its own citizens?
How much longer will parents shell out $100,000 for a college education for a son or daughter who end up employed as a bartender, waitress, or temp?
Paul Craig Roberts has held a number of academic appointments and has contributed to numerous scholarly publications. He served as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. His graduate economics education was at the University of Virginia, the University of California at Berkeley, and Oxford University. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions. He can be reached at: paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts07162005.html

Sunday, July 17, 2005

Call it "America for Sale" - Foreigners buy up American real estate

By Ron Scherer, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor Fri Jul 15, 4:00 AM ET
Earlier this year, real estate marketer Melissa Rubin took some South American clients to a party to promote a new condo that developers hoped to sell before a shovel hit the ground.
Even by Miami standards, the party was exotic. There were tigers, chimps, human flamethrowers, jumbo TVs, and the usual red-carpet food and drink. There was also a bikini-clad woman covered in chocolate. "If we take them to a party, it helps them get excited about the project," says Ms. Rubin of Platinum Properties International.

Indeed, developers are going all-out to charm their clients, and more and more those clients include the world's wealthy elite from such countries as Argentina, Mexico, Australia, and Germany. These foreign buyers, in fact, are one of the important reasons the housing bubble continues to grow in hot markets like Miami, New York, and Las Vegas. In many cases, they're taking advantage of the strong euro or trying to get their money into a dollar-denominated hiding place.

The result: In Miami, for one, some condo buildings have as much as two-thirds of their units owned by foreigners. Call it America for Sale.
"No question, foreigners are part of the bubble," says Stephen Wayner, first vice president at Bayview Financial Exchange Services LLC in Miami.

Although there are no numbers indicating how much foreigners are pouring into the United States to buy condos, there are some eye-opening anecdotal signs:
• In Las Vegas, wealthy foreign buyers - mostly from Mexico - have snapped up 12 percent of the condos at Icon, twin 48-story towers that are now almost sold out even though they won't start construction until next month.
• New York City real estate brokers estimate that up to 33 percent of new condos sold in the city are going to non-Americans, especially Europeans, who one broker describes as "very aggressive."
• Asian buyers are jumping in, too. Real estate agents are flying to Shanghai, Beijing, Bangkok, and Kuala Lumpur to talk up the property market. Recently, a large group of Korean finance, construction, insurance, and engineering executives conducted a "study tour" of southeast Florida real estate. They plan to return next April.

A bargain purchase Part of the allure of American real estate is the cost. While some of the prices may seem high to Americans, to Europeans and others the real estate feels like a bargain, particularly when figured in euros or pounds sterling.

Miami has long had a history of attracting Latin American investment. The weather reminds Central and South Americans of home, and they've visited Miami's shops for years, lugging home everything from appliances to designer sneakers. In addition, Spanish may be the first language of south Florida instead of English.

And the South American elite have long viewed the city as a safe place to stockpile dollar-denominated assets, whether it be in cash or real estate.
"Every planeload comes in with potential buyers," says Ronald Shuffield, president of Esslinger-Wooten-Maxwell Realtors in Coral Gables, which is also representing Met 3, a 74-story condo tower. "Almost every Latin American who buys a condominium here has in the back of their mind, 'That's my safe refuge. If I have to leave, that's where I can go.' "

What's also changed is the active selling of US real estate on foreign shores. Within the past month, Mr. Shuffield has sent brokers to Argentina and Spain for real estate trade shows. ("They are just like yacht trade shows," he says.) Recently, he had a broker in Mexico City meeting with people who might want to plunk down up to $2 million for a condo.

Recently, Rubin's partner rented a hotel suite in Caracas, Venezuela, to show floor plans to brokers and their clients. "He came back with lots of leads and sold a few," says Rubin, who tries to maintain a relationship with her foreign clients by sending birthday cards and calling them every six weeks to update them on the market.

The next wave of buyers might well be from Asia. Several new Miami condos have Asian names such as Mei, the mythical Chinese symbol for beauty.
This week, John Pinson, a real estate agent in Palm Beach and president of the International Real Estate Federation (FIABCI-USA), is traveling to China and Malaysia. He has also scheduled future trips to Hong Kong, Thailand, Japan, and India. "Some of the newest buyers are Vietnamese and Thais," he adds.

Marketing a 'buzz'Whoever the prospective foreign buyers, marketers say it is important to create a "buzz." One way to do this is a launch party where no money exchanges hands. In Las Vegas, the Icon tower party featured a chocolate fountain and South American, Asian, and Californian cuisine. And, says Sarah Prinsloo, president of Related Prinsloo Realty Services in Las Vegas, there were foreign real estate brokers who speak English. So far, 12 percent of the units have been sold to Mexicans. "They are coming for second homes and an investment," says Ms. Prinsloo.

Fortune International, exclusive brokers for Avenue, two new towers in Miami, are even more successful at attracting foreign buyers. In four months, Fortune has sold almost one-third of the units to South Americans and another third to Europeans. The company has a large network of foreign brokers who help to line up potential customers. They also do major events, says Lucrecia Lindemann, the sales director, such as hot-air balloon rides and special lunches.

"I'm just back from Paris, and sales to the Jewish community there are good," says Ms. Lindemann. "And the Italians are coming here for security and personal reasons."
For many of the foreigners, it's been a beneficial purchase. Lindemann says in less than a year, prices on condos along Brickell Avenue, where her buildings are rising, have soared almost 75 percent. "Everything here has been a good investment for them," she says.
Copyright © 2005 The Christian Science Monitor

Friday, July 15, 2005

Bush lobbies fellow Republicans for CAFTA approval

Bush lobbies fellow Republicans for CAFTA approval By Patricia Wilson - 07/15/2005
President Bush tried to sell a controversial Central American free trade pact to reluctant fellow Republicans on Friday by calling it a sign of U.S. commitment to emerging democracies in the region.

Solidly opposed by Democrats and unpopular among Republicans in states such as North Carolina where the textile industry has been hit hard by job losses, the Central American Free Trade Agreement would tear down trade barriers between the United States, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua and the Dominican Republic.

"CAFTA is important foreign policy," Bush said. "It will help stabilize young democracies. It will help our friends grow and prosper and that's good. It's in our interest that we do just that."
Bush toured the Helms plant of R.L. Stowe Mills in Belmont, in the Piedmont region of central North Carolina, walking between giant spools of white cotton thread and passing mammoth bales of cotton.


Noisy green cotton-winding machines drowned out shouted questions about the controversy swirling around Bush's top political adviser, Karl Rove, who is caught up in a federal investigation of who leaked the name of a covert CIA agent.

North Carolina's two Republican senators -- Elizabeth Dole and Richard Burr -- both voted for CAFTA last month. But Rep. Sue Myrick, a Republican from Charlotte, is the state's only House of Representatives' member to endorse the pact, and another, North Carolina Republican, Rep. Walter Jones, has been at the forefront of efforts to defeat it.

Democrats argue that weak worker rights provisions in the agreement will lead to labor abuses. It is also opposed by lawmakers from sugar producing states and others who link free trade to America's soaring trade deficits.

'A GOOD DEAL FOR WORKERS'

"This deal is a good deal for workers," Bush told an invited audience at Gaston College. "I am for free trade, but I'm also for a level playing field ... I took a look at the playing field. It's not level.
It's not fair."

Concerns about China's trade policies and takeover bids for U.S. companies have spread a general anxiety about trade that has spilled over into the CAFTA debate.
Some House Republicans have proposed legislation penalizing China for subsidizing its goods, hoping that a vote to punish Beijing will provide unenthusiastic colleagues enough political cover to vote for CAFTA.

Defeat on an important international trade issue would be a major blow to Bush who has been plagued by falling poll numbers and emboldened Democrats who want to consign him to lame-duck status six months into his second four-year term.

Supporters argue that failure to pass CAFTA would have a devastating impact on U.S. leadership in market-opening negotiations with the World Trade Organization and with other nations.

The Senate voted 54-45 in favor of CAFTA, setting the stage for a final battle in the House, where the agreement's many critics have vowed to defeat it. The vote could come as early as next week.

"It's important to help secure the democracies in our own neighborhood and so, for the sake of our economic security and for the sake of national security, the United States House of Representatives should follow the lead of the United States Senate and pass CAFTA," Bush said.
Before leaving for North Carolina, Bush and President Antonio Saca of El Salvador discussed the agreement during a White House meeting.

U.S. officials signed the deal a year ago but it needs congressional approval to go into effect. The six CAFTA nations now import about $15 billion worth of U.S. products each year.

(Additional reporting by Adam Entous and Doug Palmer)
Copyright © 2005 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Thursday, July 14, 2005

Michael Chertoff - Called on Congress to approve a guest worker program that would make it easier for foreign workers to enter the country legally

Immigration Overhaul Seen as Key to Domestic Security
By Nicole Gaouette Times Staff Writer Thu Jul 14, 7:55 AM ET
WASHINGTON — Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, portraying immigration policy as a vital weapon against terrorism, pledged Wednesday to tighten border security but also called on Congress to approve a guest worker program that would make it easier for foreign workers to enter the country legally. "We must gain full control of our borders to prevent illegal immigration and security breaches," Chertoff said.

But, he added, "control of the border will also require reducing the demand for illegal border migration" by channeling needed workers through a new legal system. Implicit in the guest worker program would be an increase in the number of legal immigrants. Chertoff vowed to carry his campaign for a guest worker program as well as other changes to Capitol Hill in the weeks ahead.

By linking the controversial subject of immigration policy to the popular goal of thwarting terrorists, Chertoff's plan could give new impetus to President Bush's stalled proposal for an expanded guest worker program and enhanced border security.
And, by linking the guest worker plan to calls for tougher border controls, the plan could mollify those conservative Republicans in Congress who had opposed such programs on grounds that enforcement must come first.
Revamping immigration has been a difficult issue for the Bush administration politically. It pits many business-oriented Republicans, who favor ready access to immigrant workers, against social conservatives, who express outrage at the ease with which immigrants evade U.S. laws.
Initial reaction from some congressional conservatives suggested Chertoff would not have an easy sell with Congress. (PLEASE, LETS MAKE SURE OF THAT. Start Calling)
"His chances are slim to none over here," said Rep. Thomas G. Tancredo (news, bio, voting record) (R-Colo.), who founded and leads the pro-enforcement Immigration Reform Caucus in the House.

"It's so annoying," he said, speaking of the White House and Chertoff. "They've taken our rhetoric, they're using the right words — enforcement, security. What they're really describing is, 'if we make everybody legal, we'll have solved the problem of illegal immigration in this country.' They use the right words, they just don't do the right thing."
Not all Republicans are as hostile to the administration's approach as Tancredo, but he and other critics of the administration approach have been able to block action so far.

Chertoff's proposals for beefing up border controls and reshaping the agencies responsible for them may get a better reception.
"Without question the most difficult problem the department has to face is immigration enforcement," said Rep. Christopher Cox (news, bio, voting record) (R-Newport Beach), chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security. "It's of vital importance.

"The INS [Immigration and Naturalization Service] bureaucracy that the new department inherited was roundly deemed dysfunctional," he said. "The Homeland Security Act reconstituted the pieces of the INS in new ways [but] the last few years have shown that the organizational changes themselves were not enough."

Chertoff's pitch for new immigration laws is part of a package of proposals for streamlining and tightening up the sprawling Department of Homeland Security, which was rushed into being two years ago as part the federal government's response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
With 183,000 workers pulled together from 22 federal agencies, the department has been widely regarded as a bulky bureaucracy that needs top-to-bottom reorganization.

Chertoff, a hard-driving former prosecutor and senior Justice Department official, outlined a sweeping program of organizational and other changes in the agency's structure, operations and priorities. In remarks delivered to an auditorium crowded with department officials, terrorism experts and others with a stake in department policy, Chertoff identified his top priorities as preparation for catastrophic attacks, information sharing with state and local partners and transportation security, along with overhauling immigration and restructuring the department's intelligence unit.

"Our department must drive improvement with a sense of urgency," he said.
"Our enemy constantly changes and adapts, so we as a department must be nimble and decisive." Chertoff described his proposals, which include creating positions and eliminating some bureaucratic layers, as "modest but essential course corrections" that would yield "big dividends." Most of the reorganizing can be accomplished administratively, he said, but some will require congressional action.

Chertoff said he was working with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to "ease the path for those who wish to visit, study and conduct business in this country."
At the same time, as part of a package of changes designed to give the department more precise information on who was entering the country, he proposed more fingerprinting of first-time visitors.
Taken together, such steps — along with immigration changes — seemed designed to ease the passage of most travelers, who pose little or no threat, and enable federal agents to focus more closely on those whose backgrounds were unclear or aroused suspicion.
In some areas, Chertoff wants to create positions, including an assistant secretary for cyber and telecommunications security and another assistant secretary to head a new policy division. Shortly after Chertoff's speech, the White House nominated Stewart A. Baker, a UCLA law school graduate and former general counsel for the National Security Agency, to be assistant secretary for policy.

Chertoff also announced the creation of a chief intelligence officer, a position he said would help fuse more than 10 offices within Homeland Security that produced intelligence.
That officer would head a beefed-up information analysis division that would report directly to the secretary and be the primary connection to other groups in the intelligence community.
In other divisions, Chertoff proposed eliminating layers of middle management, including the Border and Transportation Security Directorate, which oversees agencies that do most of the hands-on work of dealing with the nation's immigration challenges.

The directorate's three components — Border Patrol; Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which is responsible for internal immigration enforcement, and Customs and Border Protection — would report directly to the secretary or the undersecretary.
Chertoff also announced plans to:
• Turn the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which deals primarily with hurricanes and other natural disasters, into a free-standing unit. It is now merged with the directorate responsible for preparedness against terrorism.
• Move the Federal Air Marshals organization, which has chafed against the buttoned-down management style of the former Secret Service officials who now run it, into the more flexible environs of the Transportation Security Administration.
• Create a position of a chief medical officer to better coordinate the department's work with the agencies primarily responsible for security issues involving health, such as stocking vaccines and preparing to deal with bio-terrorist incidents.

Chertoff's audience of Washington insiders interrupted his speech once, to applaud the news that passengers using the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport would no longer be required to stay seated for 30 minutes before arrival or after takeoff.
Copyright © 2005 Los Angeles Times

Wednesday, July 13, 2005

Motorola opens Taiwan, India Research Centers - (Think before you buy) Boycott WORKS!

SAN FRANCISCO: Motorola Inc. said on Tuesday it had opened two research and design centers in India and Taiwan, as part of a move to develop technology in the Asia Pacific market.

The Bangalore facility will be the second-largest Motorola research center in India, and the Taipei facility will be Motorola's second in Taiwan.

Embracing Illegal Immigrants - BusinessWeek Online and Yahoo - Propaganda.

Who started the words undocumented instead of illegal and Loves Free Trade, Guest Workers and all the Visas for cheap labor? George W. Bush!

BusinessWeek Online and Yahoo's Propaganda for Cheap Labor.

Embracing Illegal Immigrants - By Brian Grow, with Adrienne Carter and Roger O. Crockett in Chicago and Geri Smith in Mexico CityBusinessWeek Online.

America's undocumented population is now seen as an untapped engine for growth. Over the past several years, big U.S. consumer companies like banks and mortgage lenders have decided that a market of 11 million potential customers is simply too big to ignore.

Companies are getting hooked on the buying power of 11 million undocumented immigrants.
Inez and Antonio Valenzuela are a marketer's dream. Young, upwardly mobile, and ready to spend on their growing family, the Los Angeles couple in many ways reflects the 42 million Hispanics in the U.S. Age 30 and 29, respectively, with two daughters, Esmeralda, 8, and Maria Luisa, 2 months, the duo puts in long hours, working 4 p.m. to 2 a.m., six days a week, at their bustling streetside taco trailer. From a small sidewalk stand less than two years ago, they built the business into a hot destination for hungry commuters. The Valenzuelas (not their real name) bring in revenue well above the U.S. household average of $43,000, making them a solidly middle-class family that any U.S. consumer-products company would love to reach.

But Inez and Antonio aren't your typical American consumers. They're undocumented immigrants who live and work in the U.S. illegally. When the couple, along with Esmeralda, crossed the Mexican border five years ago, they had little money, no jobs, and lacked basic documents such as Social Security numbers. Guided by friends and family, the couple soon discovered how to navigate the increasingly above-ground world of illegal residency. At the local Mexican consulate, the Valenzuelas each signed up for an identification card known as a matrícula consular, for which more than half the applicants are undocumented immigrants, according to the Pew Hispanic center, a Washington think tank. Scores of financial institutions now accept it for bank accounts, credit cards, and car loans. Next, they applied to the Internal Revenue Service for individual tax identification numbers (ITINS), allowing them to pay taxes like any U.S. citizen -- and thereby to eventually get a home mortgage.

Today, companies large and small eagerly cater to the Valenzuelas -- regardless of their status. In 2003 they paid $11,000 for a used Ford Motor Co. van plus $70,000 more for a gleaming new 30-foot trailer that now serves as headquarters and kitchen for their restaurant. A local car dealer gave them a loan for the van based only on Antonio's matrícula card and his Mexican driver's license. Verizon Communications Inc. also accepted his matrícula when he signed up for cell-phone service. So did a Wells Fargo & Co. branch in the predominantly Hispanic neighborhood in northeast Los Angeles where they live. Having a bank account allows them to pay bills by check and build up their savings. Their goal: to trade up from a one-bedroom rental to their own home. Eventually, they also hope to expand their business by buying several more trailers. Matrícula holders like the Valenzuelas are "bringing us all the money that has been under the mattress," says Wells Fargo branch manager Steven Contreraz.

Growth engineFor more than two decades, America's illegal aliens have been the target of national attention -- largely for negative reasons. Their growing numbers put downward pressure on U.S. wages and new demands on schools, hospitals, and other public services. Fears of heavier social burdens and higher tax bills have led citizens and local officials to object with renewed vigor to what many perceive as an unwanted invasion from Mexico and other countries, especially to newer destination states such as Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, and Tennessee (BW, July 4, 2005). Yet all the while, farms, hotels, restaurants, small manufacturers, and other employers have continued to hire the undocumented with little regard to the federal laws intended to stop them.

At the same time, though, the fast-growing undocumented population is coming to be seen as an untapped engine of growth. In the past several years, big U.S. consumer companies -- banks, insurers, mortgage lenders, credit-card outfits, phone carriers, and others -- have decided that a market of 11 million or so potential customers is simply too big to ignore. It may be against the law for the Valenzuelas to be in the U.S. or for an employer to hire them, but there's nothing illegal about selling to them.

So with a wary eye on the heated political debate, business is targeting the Valenzuelas and millions of others who have entered the country illegally. Many companies do so more or less openly. Wells Fargo has half a million matrícula accounts, a majority of them, they acknowledge, opened by unauthorized aliens who lack regular residency or citizenship papers. At the Valenzuelas' branch, fully 80% of accounts are opened by matrícula holders. Blue Cross of California, whose parent, WellPoint Inc., is the nation's largest health insurer, sells health insurance to matrícula holders from company-staffed desks set up inside Mexican and Guatemalan consular offices in the U.S. Sprint Corp. accepts such an I.D. for cell-phone contracts.

Other companies, such as Kraft Foods Inc., won't discuss the status of their customers but explicitly target Hispanic newcomers -- more than half of whom are estimated to enter the U.S. illegally, according to a new study by Pew. The consumer-products giant provides workbooks at local English-as-a-second-language classes that include instructions for using coupons for products such as Kraft's Capri Sun drinks in U.S. grocery stores. It also hosts bilingual sweepstake events in Hispanic neighborhoods. "We need to fish where the fish are," says Robert Simpson, Kraft's director of multicultural marketing. He calls part of the Hispanic audience he's trying to reach the "unacculturated," meaning people unfamiliar with American culture and customs.

The corporate Establishment's new hunger for the undocumenteds' business could have far-reaching implications for America's stance on immigration policy, which remains unresolved. Corporations are helping, essentially, to bring a huge chunk of the underground economy into the mainstream. By finding ways to treat illegals like any other consumers, companies are in effect legalizing -- and legitimizing -- millions of people who technically have no right to be in the U.S. It's even happening in mirror image, with some Mexican companies setting up programs to follow customers who move to the U.S. All this knits the U.S. and Mexico closer together, further blurring the border and population distinctions.

The economic impact could be significant. While most analysts peg the number of illegal immigrants at 10 million to 11 million, a recent study by Bear Stearns Asset Management concluded that data on housing permits, school enrollment, and foreign remittances suggests there could be as many as 20 million. Either way, experts agree that the undocumented, a majority of whom are Hispanic, are one of the nation's largest sources of population growth.

They add 700,000 new consumers to the economy every year, more even than the 600,000 or so legal immigrants, according to Pew's new study. What's more, 84% of illegals are 18-to-44-year-olds, in their prime spending years, vs. 60% of legal residents. Corporate sales and profits will get a shot in the arm if more of them move out of the cash economy, put their money in banks, and take out credit cards, car loans, and home mortgages. U.S. gross national product could get a boost, too, since consumers with credit can spend more than those limited to cash.

More undocumented immigrants paying income and property taxes would help ease the taxpayer strain for the schools, health care, roads, and other services illegals use. Crime could decline, too. Wells Fargo pioneered acceptance of the matrícula in 2001 after police department in Austin, Tex., asked local financial firms for help in preventing holdups of undocumented immigrants who, lacking I.D.s to open bank accounts, tend to carry wads of cash. "The market has found a way to capture those dollars," says Robert Justich, a senior managing director of Bear Stearns Asset Management and co-author of the recent report The Underground Labor Force Is Rising to the Surface.

The political implications are less clear-cut. Further integration of illegals into the U.S. could help President George W. Bush in his uphill struggle over the past two years to launch a guest worker program. His plan would provide a path to amnesty and full legalization for many unauthorized residents. Companies are taking a position similar to the President's, in effect saying: There's no point in pretending that millions of people aren't here, so let's find ways to deal with them.

Hate e-mailBut corporations' willingness to overlook the status of this lucrative demographic target could further inflame opposition to illegal immigration. Consider the case of New South Federal Savings Bank. In May, the Birmingham (Ala.) company launched a mortgage product called Casa Mia, aimed principally at local Hispanic immigrants, a disproportionately undocumented group whose ranks quadrupled in the state, to 96,000, between 1990 and 2004. The program offers 20-year fixed-rate mortgages to applicants with two years of residency, stable employment, and an ITIN.

But within days of the announcement, New South received hostile phone calls and e-mails, some saying they were from Minutemen, the group patrolling the U.S.-Mexico border in Arizona and Texas. "I can think of no more traitorous act than you offering illegal immigrants, who are overunning this country, Casa Mia loans," said an e-mail that a bank official showed BusinessWeek.

Bank officials were even more troubled by a letter from a Washington group called Friends of Immigration Law Enforcement (FILE), which opposes illegal immigration. It threatened to sue the bank under a federal law that prohibits the harboring of illegal aliens and racketeering. By providing mortgage loans that help illegals buy houses, says FILE Executive Director Craig Nelsen, New South is aiding their ability to remain illegally. In June, the bank delayed a broad rollout of Casa Mia pending a legal opinion on potential liability.

Still, such confrontations are relatively rare. Mostly, U.S. companies are finding rapid growth among an underserved population hungry to taste more of America's rich consumer life. Among the first to embrace illegals have been financial companies, eager to tap into the billions in so-called mattress money -- the cash kept at home by illegals and others without bank accounts. When Wells and a half-dozen other banks got the green light from the U.S. Treasury in 2001 to accept the matrícula, the magnitude of the market opportunity wasn't yet recognized, says Shelley Freeman, Wells Fargo's regional president for Los Angeles, who helped develop the program.

It quickly became apparent. Largely via word of mouth in Hispanic neighborhoods, Wells Fargo has opened 525,000 matrícula accounts, which now represent 6% of the bank's total. It opens 800 new accounts a day across the 23 states in which it does business. Wells expanded the program to a Guatemalan matrícula in 2002 and an Argentinian version in 2003. Last October, Colombia launched a pilot matrícula program; El Salvador plans to offer a similar I.D. this fall.

Since few immigrants apply for the matrícula if they can legally obtain U.S. identity documents, immigration experts say, it's clear whom companies are going after when they accept it. Overall, 404 banks, thrifts, and credit unions, including Bank of America Corp. and Citigroup, now accept the I.D., according to the Mexican Foreign Ministry. So do 391 city governments and 1,203 police and sheriff departments. Banks will be big winners: Fully 32% of all Hispanics lack bank accounts -- and even more among the illegal population. As much as half of all U.S. retail banking growth is expected to come from new immigrants over the next decade, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

The success of the matrícula has encouraged the expansion of other financial products, such as home mortgages, using the ITIN. Created for people such as foreigners with U.S. investments who aren't eligible for a Social Security number but still may owe U.S. income taxes, the agency issued 900,000 ITINs last year and a total of 8 million since 1996. In Chicago, Second Federal Savings has 620 ITIN loans worth $90 million. Expect the stream of new applicants to continue apace, say bank officials, especially now that state housing development agencies in Wisconsin and Illinois have agreed to start buying the loans.

Cincinnati-based Fifth Third Bancorp, the nation's 13th-largest bank, began accepting the matrícula in 2002 and introduced several ITIN products last fall, including mortgages, home equity lines of credit, and car loans. "We're committed to making the American Dream possible; our obligation is to provide products that allow people to assimilate into the U.S. economy," says Saul R. Boscan, Fifth's director of special initiatives in the Chicago region.

The result is a hot new market in the making. With hundreds of thousands of illegal alien households earning enough to qualify for $95,000 mortgages, according to the National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals, ITIN and conventional mortgages taken out by illegals could be worth as much as $60 billion over the next five years. That's pushing big banks such as JPMorgan Chase & Co. to examine the market and upping pressure on mortgage buyers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to create a secondary market for ITIN loans.

The bulk of immigrants, of course, are Mexicans who come from poor villages and who lack skills; their overall average family income is just $27,000 a year, vs. $46,000 for legal residents, according to Pew. But a growing number of the undocumented are upscale, too. Increasingly, upper-middle-class immigrants are entering the U.S. illegally from other Latin American countries as well as from places such as South Korea. Camila and Diego Sandoval (not their real names), walked off a plane from Lima, Peru, four years ago as tourists and never went back to their professional jobs.

Diego, 33, got work parking cars but soon went into business for himself designing pools and processing construction permits. Camila, 29, joined him after a stint at a hotel. Together, the two now pull down $120,000 a year. That's enough to buy a plush black Volkswagen Touareg SUV from a Miami dealership that offered Diego a preapproved auto loan. The couple rent a two-bedroom bungalow three blocks off the beach in a tony north Miami neighborhood.

Still, the Sandovals continue to live at least partly in the shadows despite companies' willingness to do business with them. Last year, Camila obtained residency papers by making a marriage of convenience to a friend who is a legal resident. But when Diego tried to become legal the same way, he soon found that his bride had been fictitiously married 11 times. So he filed for a divorce rather than risk an interview with immigration officials.

Some companies worried about a backlash argue that marketing to the undocumented serves the larger public good as well as their own commercial self-interest. Blue Cross of California and a sister unit, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Georgia, say they're helping to mitigate the health insurance crisis by accepting the Mexican matrícula as a valid I.D. With as many as 2 million of California's estimated 6.2 million uninsured coming from Mexico, Blue Cross believes it can sell basic health insurance to a big block of new customers accustomed to free -- but often lower quality -- health care at home.

So far, Blue Cross says it may have signed up several thousand Mexicans with the matrícula, although it doesn't yet track the number. In May it extended the program to matrícula holders from Guatemala, and it's working on a video-marketing campaign for Guatemalans who speak an ancient Mayan dialect, K'anjobal, so old that it's no longer written. On weekdays at the Guatemalan consulate in Los Angeles, dozens of I.D. applicants who speak mostly Spanish funnel past a sales desk where a Blue Cross agent explains the basics of health insurance in their language.

On a recent Tuesday morning, he had two sales leads by 9:30 a.m. "Our view is that these people are already here. They are part of the drain on the health-care system," says Michael Chee, a spokesman for Blue Cross of California. "If we get them to pay, then they are helping alleviate the problem. It's a health-care issue, not an immigration issue."
Other companies feel no need to rationalize. They see opportunity -- and no reason not to grab it. Viscom International Inc., a five-year-old Atlanta company, sells prepaid phone cards to first-generation Mexican immigrants.

Its first product is its BEST Mexico card, aimed at those who frequently call family back home. To build customer loyalty, Viscom hands out BEST Mexico cards at festivals popular with Mexican immigrants. And it slaps its bright yellow, red, and green logo on buses and bus stops along roads such as Atlanta's Buford Highway, a main artery for Latinos making their way into the U.S. "The guy that just got here is going to make a lot more calls than the guy who has been here three generations; it doesn't matter if they're legal or not," says Viscom Chief Executive John Wise.

Keeping in touchCompanies such as Sprint feel the same way. The telecom company started accepting the matrícula in 2004 as part of its 14-city Hispanic marketing program. The chief product is a $4-a-month international-calling plan that allows users to phone anywhere in Mexico for 9 cents a minute. Hispanics constitute one of the fastest-growing markets in telecom, and Sprint sees illegals as a key part of it. The undocumented are "an area that is an important consumer base for us. We care about Hispanics in general, of which they are an important part," says Cindy L. Jordan, Sprint's top multicultural marketing manager.

Some smaller companies are building their entire business around undocumented immigrants. One is No Borders Inc., a Venice (Calif.)-based startup run by Raul Hinojosa, an associate professor of political economy at the University of California at Los Angeles. The company offers debit-like cards on which immigrants can store cash, send money home, pay for video teleconferencing calls, and join medical discount plans. Going head-to-head with First Data Corp.'s Western Union Financial Services and other wire transfer services, No Borders plans to open 150 storefronts from Los Angeles to Georgia by September.

It's a market Hinojosa believes is full of potential. Recently at a No Borders outlet in Venice, 26-year-old Félix Castillo (not his real name), an undocumented immigrant from Santa Ana de Valle in Mexico, showed off his 4-month-old son, Lucas, to his grandparents at home via a 52-in. TV and a Webcam. No Borders affiliates have set up outlets in small villages in Mexico to make such connections, at a cost of $25 for 30 minutes. On both sides of the border, the families chatted in their Mexican dialect, Zapoteca. Castillo's parents had never laid eyes on their grandson. "I hadn't seen my mother in four years.

Now, I've seen her three times in three months," says Castillo, a food runner at a Venice restaurant who crossed the border seven years ago. Such ventures further intertwine the two countries as well as make money for No Borders.
Big U.S. companies' embrace of undocumenteds as consumers has intensified as it has become clear in recent years that -- no matter how loudly the anti-immigration lobby complains -- the U.S. isn't about to deport illegals en masse. The 1986 law forbidding their employment may still be on the books, but the feds have almost completely given up enforcing it.

Instead, since September 11 they have focused on nabbing potential terrorists who might slip into the country illegally, according to a June report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Last year, the U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement agency brought just three actions against companies for employing illegals, down from 417 in 1999, according to the GAO. And only 2,300 of the country's 5.6 million employers used a computer system in 2004 to check employee Social Security numbers.

Unafraid of penalties, some U.S. industries have become so dependent on illegal labor that a wholesale expulsion would be crippling. Illegal immigrants now comprise fully half of all farm laborers, up from 12% in 1990, according to a recent Labor Dept. survey. They're a quarter of workers in the meat and poultry industry, 24% of dishwashers, and 27% of drywall and ceiling tile installers, according to Pew senior research associate Jeffrey S. Passel. Last year, more than 1 million of the nation's 2.5 million new jobs went to Hispanics, mostly recent immigrants, according to a separate study by Pew. With millions of illegals here to stay, "companies will definitely adapt to working with [them] because they're the fastest-growing marketplace," says Bear Stearns' Justich.

Illegals' importance to the U.S. economy is key to the country's often schizophrenic views toward them. Chronic complaints from taxpayers and workers aside, companies that hire or sell to the undocumented simply have too much at stake to allow a backlash to get out of hand. Even politicians who thunder about illegals have trouble sticking to their convictions.
Such was the case with Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo of Colorado, who says he may run for President in 2008 on a largely anti-immigration platform. One suggestion he made last year: a tax on the remittances foreigners send home as a way to recoup the education and health-care costs Tancredo chalks up to freeloading.

But he quickly dropped the idea after an outcry from Denver-based First Data, whose Western Union unit took in $1.1 billion last year from such money transfers. First Data Corp.'s political action committee and its chief executive, Charles T. Fote, each wrote $2,000 checks in support of Tancredo's opponent. Tancredo won reelection but has revised his plan: Rather than tax the individual transaction, he proposes reducing foreign aid by the amount of remittances that countries like Mexico receive from their citizens in the U.S.

The problem for critics of illegal immigration is that corporate efforts to sell to the undocumented weaves them ever more tightly into the fabric of American life. This pragmatic relationship may be anathema to immigration critics. But day by day, the undocumented in the U.S. are finding it ever easier to save and invest their hard-earned dollars.
http://biz.yahoo.com/special/illegal05_article1.html

"A Massive Economic Development Boom"
Edited by Patricia O'ConnellBusinessWeek Online

That's what legalizing undocumented immigrants would unleash, creating a win for everyone, says UCLA professor Raul Hinojosa.
In the heated debate over what to do about illegal immigrants in the U.S., few participants are as unabashedly in favor of swiftly legalizing them as Dr. Raul Hinojosa. The 48-year-old professor of political economy at the University of California at Los Angeles is one of the leading experts on the undocumented immigrant population and its impact on the U.S. economy.

A former adviser to President Bill Clinton and an early architect of the North American Development Bank, the principal financing institution for the North American Free Trade Act (NAFTA), Hinojosa argues immigrants from Mexico and other Latin American countries are the threads that inextricably knit the U.S. and its southern neighbors together -- and prop up a labor market desperate for cheap workers.

Indeed, Hinojosa, a fast-talking, pony-tailed graduate of University of Chicago's PhD program, is cashing in on the boom in illegal immigration himself. His startup, No Borders Inc., pedals debit-like cards on which immigrants can store cash, send money home to Mexico, make phone calls, and join medical discount plans.

BusinessWeek correspondent Brian Grow spoke with him about the emerging trend of companies big and small targeting the booming illegal immigrant consumer market -- and whether mass deportation, which some politicians have suggested, is a viable economic solution. Edited excerpts of their conversation follow:

Q: How is the undocumented immigrant community affecting the U.S. economy?A: First and foremost, it's a source of value added. The total goods and services that they consume through their paycheck, plus all that they produce for their employers, is close to about $800 billion. They're also producing at relatively lower costs because the undocumented population typically gets about 20% less in wages than if they were legalized. That leads to lower prices for us and higher profits to employers.
In addition, they're obviously a huge consumer base. We've seen that 90% of the wages that the undocumented population gets are spent inside the U.S. Remittances are sent abroad, but that only represents about 10% of immigrants' income. The numbers are becoming quite huge. We estimate about $50 billion dollars in remittances this year. That means that total consumptive capacity remaining in the U.S. is $400 billion to $450 billion.

Q: Why are companies waking up to the largely untapped opportunity to target the undocumented?
A: This is by definition a segment of the economy that has almost purposely been pushed underground by our neglect of immigration policy. We know we need these workers. Nevertheless, we haven't brought [this issue] out of the shadows, so it hasn't been on the radar scope for most companies. But now they're turning around and realizing that these workers are everywhere, and they're not only consuming in the mom-and-pop stores, they're increasingly going and buying all types of goods and services.
Companies are also seeing it as a hugely growing segment of the population. The other element is that they're a group that has traditionally paid cash and been outside the credit system. If you're able to bring them into a creditworthy capability, that's even a bigger impact. For example, we estimate that if undocumented families were allowed to buy houses, they've got the capability to buy more than $75 billion in new mortgages.

Q: If more companies embrace illegals, how might it reshape the way the nation thinks about this segment of the population?
A: I think it could change the discussion so that we wouldn't call them illegals. We would probably call them legalized workers. The assumption has always been that somehow you're doing something illegal, you're taking away from the society, when in fact everybody is now seeing that their irregular immigration status is something that should be done away with.
Also, it would make corporations understand that there's huge untapped potential for growth of markets right here within the borders of the U.S.
The other thing that would be extremely important is that, to the extent that the undocumented are bought out of the shadows and into the economy, it [would be good for] lowering of inequalities. What we've created in this country is in effect a two-tier economy where we literally have an underdeveloped economy isolated in certain ghettos that are thriving actually. To the extent that those markets could be integrated, that would be good for cities and for those families, as well as the economic wellbeing of all of us.

Q: You had a cameo part in the movie, A Day Without a Mexican, which tried to depict how the deportation of illegal workers would affect daily life in the U.S. What would the impact of a mass deportation be on the U.S. economy?
A: If you took away the undocumented population, it would be the worst economic disaster in the history of the U.S., particularly in the case of California, where it's estimated that half of the undocumented [live].
You could easily be talking about an impact of hundreds of billions of dollars. Actually, A Day Without a Mexican is very much a sugar-coated Hollywood version of how things would be. What you really would have is a halt of all types of vital services.
We have also looked at what would happen if you actually did pass laws that are currently being proposed to take away immigrants' access to identification cards, to being able to call for basic social services. It's not going to stop the magnet for undocumented labor in the U.S. All that it would do is simply push it further underground.
Ironically, by pushing the rights of these workers further underground, the only thing you've done is lower their wages, and therefore actually increase the demand for undocumented immigration.

Q: Congress is trying to figure out how to stem the flow of undocumented immigrants, but Corporate America is figuring out how to embrace them more. Why the divergent paths?
A: Congress simply doesn't get it. They should take a page from that great American Ronald Reagan. He looked hard at the issue and basically said what we need to do is let the market work. As President Bush has said, let willing workers and willing employers have a level playing field to be able to bring the workers that we need for our economy. Our studies have shown movement towards legalization would actually reduce demand for undocumented illegal workers.
That may sound paradoxical but it's exactly what happened after Reagan signed the Immigration Reform & Control Act in 1986. As workers became legalized, the number of people crossing illegally into the U.S. dropped dramatically. [The] 1986 law [also] increased the ability of workers to move from job to job and look for higher pay, eliminating the worst-paying jobs, raising wages at the lower end of the economy, and actually eliminating a lot of the sweatshop jobs that at one point dominated -- and now again dominate -- the immigrant economy.
The best solution for the entire country from a public-policy perspective is to bring this economy out of the shadows, bring it into the mainstream, empower [these people] with both legal and economic rights. Everybody wins. Immigration reform has been put forth primarily as an amnesty. It's actually a massive economic development boom that we should embrace immediately.

Sunday, July 10, 2005

US work visa opens door to short-term jobs - "When will all this TREASON STOP! - How far will they go?"

(More salt to the wound for all unemployed Americans - Thanks to George W. Bush, who LOVES cheap Labor) US work visa opens door to short-term jobs

In a move that was aggressively lobbied for by many large and understaffed American employers, the US Department of Labor (DOL) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced recently proposed changes to its H-2B work visa application process.

These changes would streamline the current burdensome process for filling short-term jobs that Americans cannot, will not or do not have the skills to fill—(Please someone name one job where that is true - this is ALL Bush crap LIES) Americans making it more responsive to urgent workforce needs while maintaining appropriate labor market and security safeguards.

Under the H-2B program, employers seek temporary non-immigrant foreign workers only after determining that qualified American workers are not available (Yea right, what a bunch of bull). The Department of Labor’s new responsibility would be to conduct audits of certain approved H-2B petitions. These audits would examine whether employers have complied with labor market tests, including appropriate recruitment efforts for American workers.
(Never has happened and never will)

Under the proposed one-step process, most employers would file their labor certification directly with the Department of Homeland Security after recruiting for American workers.
“This is a thoroughly positive move by Labor and Homeland Security.

It brings qualified international workers into the US market, but does not displace American workers” notes author Sacha DeVoretz, who’s new book, How to Get a Job in the USA…TODAY! (only if you are not American) was just published. DeVoretz, a member of the National Employment Counseling Association —USA, is enthusiastic about the changes, and she sees them as a victory for international applicants, too.

“This somewhat restores the equity and ability for the skilled foreign labor pool to apply their trade skills in the United States again, since the US government cut back on such employment permits after September 11.”

Changes like those proposed by the DOL and DHS still come with a form of those heightened security measures—such as thorough background checks during the application process—but there is also safeguards proposed to be in place to protect all workers from deceitful employers looking to take advantage of the system.

If, after a DOL audit, an employer is found to have misrepresented a material fact or made fraudulent statements, failed to comply with their attestations, or failed to cooperate in the audit process, the Labor Department would have the authority to bar a company from filing H-2B petitions with the Department of Homeland Security for up to three years.

All in all, these positive changes are what business lobbyists and US government lawmakers were pushing for: to undo some of the more restrictive immigration policies US President George Bush’s cabinet put in place during their first term in power.

Last year, as part of the controversial $388 billion Omnibus Appropriations Bill that was passed by the United States Congress, both legislative Houses passed a new legislative measure to provide an additional 20,000 H-1B work visas, and once again open the hotly contested H-1B Work Visa gate.

The additional 20,000 visas are to be reserved specifically for International Students in American universities with Master’s or Doctorate degrees, and will benefit thousands of International students who are either waiting in American campuses or back at home.
Those visas are to be treated as an exemption from the current cap of 65,000 visas, the supply of which was exhausted on the very first day they were available last October.

“A new, one-step process envisioned by these proposed changes will fill temporary gaps in the American workforce and let labor markets function more effectively for short-term employment needs,” said Emily Stover DeRocco, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment and Training. “Since most of these jobs are seasonal and short-term in nature, they need to be filled quickly.”

DeVoretz offers that foreign workers should not wait for American employers to warm up to the opportunities of the new regulations, but instead be prepared to go straight to US companies and cities where their job skills are most needed—and sell their services based on the new H-2B allocations.

“H-2B is a long process, so this is the perfect time to be doing the ground work. The earlier you get started on your American job search, the more opportunity an overseas worker will find. The relaxation of some of the regulations is a great beginning for everyone
(except for all unemployed Americans), but the applicant still really has to know how to best present themselves and their skills to a potential H-2B American employer.
That’s what will get you the job.”

For additional information about the H-2B program, visit the Employment and Training Administration’s website at www.dol.gov.--Sacha DeVoretz, www.americajobnet.com.
http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2005/jul/10/yehey/career/20050710car1.html